Yes, regular dips, but probably #contamination by a nearby EB. KID 12121738
When looking at other quarters, it seems clear that it's #contamination
Of course #contamination, the eclipse depth is too small, see also http://talk.planethunters.org/objects/APH10104545
KID 6864569 , it looks like an RR_Lyrae star, but the change in magnitude is a bit small, maybe #contamination , see UKIRT image.
Probably #contamination by a BGEB, see also http://talk.planethunters.org/objects/APH10008926 , InCat=false in the EB catalog.
Heavy #contamination by KID 6543674. See http://talk.planethunters.org/discussions/DPH100ib1x
KID 8635938. Probably #contamination by a nearby EB. The TCE list gives P1=350.391 days, R1=4.15 R_Earth, P2=43.7996 days, R2=3.45 R_Earth.
Probably #contamination by a nearby EB. Confirmed "Kepler false-positive". KID 5816811
yes, the signature is certainly from an EB, but the eclipse depth is much too small to be a bona fide EB, it's #contamination.
InCat False in http://keplerebs.villanova.edu/overview/?k=6182846 , so it's very likely #contamination